<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>SEO News and SEO Tips from SEO Blog Expert &#187; gmail</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.theexpertseo.com/tag/gmail/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.theexpertseo.com</link>
	<description>free seo, inexpensive seo, information seo, search engine optimization seo, seo, seo advertising, seo blog, seo expert, seo forum, seo news, seo optimization, seo positioning, seo promotion, seo ranking, seo services, seo tip</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 19 Aug 2010 16:31:44 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Google Outages Damage Cloud Credibility</title>
		<link>http://blog.theexpertseo.com/google-outages-damage-cloud-credibility/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.theexpertseo.com/google-outages-damage-cloud-credibility/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Sep 2009 12:10:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[TopNews]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gmail]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.theexpertseo.com/?p=177</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Gmail was out this morning&#8230;again. The outage affected only a small percentage of Gmail users, but in the wake of Tuesday&#8217;s Google News outage the lack of reliability from Google isn&#8217;t helping justify the business case for embracing the cloud.
The cloud is all the rage. Vendors of all shapes and sizes are in a race [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Gmail was out this morning&#8230;again. The outage affected only a small percentage of Gmail users, but in the wake of Tuesday&#8217;s Google News outage the lack of reliability from Google isn&#8217;t helping justify the business case for embracing the cloud.</p>
<p>The cloud is all the rage. Vendors of all shapes and sizes are in a race to move as many products and services as possible to the cloud &#8211; providing managed services and software-as-a-service rather than traditional, locally-installed, software applications.</p>
<p>There are many major players investing in moving customers to the cloud. Amazon has a cloud computing offering and recently bolstered it with a more secure, segregated private cloud service. Microsoft provides hosted online productivity services and recently rolled out the technical preview of Office Web Apps, delivering Word, Excel, PowerPoint, and OneNote from the cloud.</p>
<p>Google is arguably the primary champion of cloud computing. The Web is what Google does. Google has a virtually endless list of products and services that are all delivered via the Web from the cloud.</p>
<p>Google is not content with dominating Web search or search engine advertising. It has an ongoing crusade to deliver business productivity from the Web. Google is taking on Microsoft head-to-head across a range of markets in an effort to wrest control from the desktop and move the computing experience to the Web.</p>
<p>That crusade has had relative success. Many users and businesses have found that Google Docs can fill their office productivity needs. Gmail can fulfill their e-mail needs. Google Calendar provides scheduling. Google Talk delivers instant messaging. Basically, Google has enough tools and services to fulfill virtually all of the productivity and communications needs for an organization&#8230;from the Web.</p>
<p>The problem is that Google has experienced repeated issues with service outages. Here are just a few of the headline-making outages:</p>
<p>·         September 24, 2009: Gmail outage</p>
<p>·         September 22, 2009: Google News outage</p>
<p>·         September 1, 2009: Gmail outage</p>
<p>·         May 14, 2009: Google network outage</p>
<p>·         May 18, 2009: Google News outage</p>
<p>·         March 9, 2009: Gmail outage</p>
<p>·         August 7, 2008: Gmail and Google Apps outage</p>
<p>These repeated outages damage the credibility of the cloud. Enterprises that are considering the pros and cons of moving office productivity or communications to the cloud have reason to be concerned when the poster child of cloud computing can&#8217;t provide reliable availability.</p>
<p>The cloud offers many potential advantages for customers, but one of the biggest factors driving apprehension and impeding adoption is availability. Customers are reluctant to offload productivity and communication to the cloud if the possibility exists for the cloud to disappear. Productivity and communication are mission-critical aspects for businesses and reliable availability is not negotiable.</p>
<p>David Coursey summed it up nicely, stating &#8220;Rather than adding features that add only questionable value to our lives, such as Sidewiki and Fast Flip news, maybe Google needs to stop, take a deep breath, and focus on quality and reliability for products many of us use every day? &#8221;</p>
<p>Google can help improve the reputation of the cloud and further its own agenda to make desktop applications obsolete and move everything to the Web by ensuring that the products and services it provides are as reliable as they are functional.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.theexpertseo.com/google-outages-damage-cloud-credibility/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Gmail Makes Labels Act More Like Folders</title>
		<link>http://blog.theexpertseo.com/gmail-makes-labels-act-more-like-folders/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.theexpertseo.com/gmail-makes-labels-act-more-like-folders/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 04 Jul 2009 10:36:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[TopNews]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gmail]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gmail labels]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.theexpertseo.com/?p=106</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Before I take leave of this computer for the long weekend, it&#8217;s time to attend to one of the most contentious issues on the Web: the Gmail folders-versus-labels controversy.
Since Google launched its free Web-mail service on April Fool&#8217;s day of 2004, it has insisted that Gmail&#8217;s labeling system&#8211;in which you can tag messages with one [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Before I take leave of this computer for the long weekend, it&#8217;s time to attend to one of the most contentious issues on the Web: the <strong>Gmail</strong> folders-versus-labels controversy.</p>
<p>Since <strong>Google</strong> launched its free Web-mail service <a href="http://www.google.com/press/pressrel/gmail.html">on April Fool&#8217;s day of 2004</a>, it has insisted that Gmail&#8217;s labeling system&#8211;in which you can tag messages with one or more labels like &#8220;work,&#8221; &#8220;repeatedly forwarded jokes,&#8221; &#8220;spam,&#8221; etc.&#8211;works better than traditional folders for organizing your messages.</p>
<p>That argument has some logic to it: With labels, you can file a message in more than one place, just as playlists work in a music program. But many Gmail users have spent too much time with folder-centric mail programs to give that up. Many others don&#8217;t bother with labels at all&#8211;at one point, only 29 percent of Gmail users had created even one, the Mountain View, Calif., company revealed in a <a href="http://googleblog.blogspot.com/2009/07/evolution-of-gmail-labels.html">blog post</a> yesterday.</p>
<p>Back in February, Google relented on its label-centric view, <a href="http://gmailblog.blogspot.com/2009/02/new-ways-to-label-with-move-to-and-auto.html">adding a &#8220;Move To&#8221; command</a> that both applies a label to a message and transfers it from Gmail&#8217;s seemingly endless inbox to an archive folder, named after that label.</p>
<p>Yesterday, Google conceded a little more. Gmail now displays your labels just below its real folders (Inbox, Sent, Drafts, Spam). You can label a message by dragging a label from that list onto the message. And you can label and move messages in one step by dragging them onto the label listed at the right&#8211;the same action you&#8217;d use to chuck that e-mail into a folder in a program like <strong>Microsoft&#8217;s</strong> Outlook or <strong>Apple&#8217;s</strong> Mail.</p>
<p>If you&#8217;d place yourself in the folder-traditionalist camp, are these latest Gmail tweaks good enough for you? If you&#8217;d rather categorize yourself as a labeler, has Google compromised the concept too much with this step? Sound off in the comments&#8230; but, please, not if that would get in the way of watching parades, setting off fireworks, catching a baseball game or other appropriate July 4th weekend activities.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.theexpertseo.com/gmail-makes-labels-act-more-like-folders/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Google breaks down, spreads global panic</title>
		<link>http://blog.theexpertseo.com/google-breaks-down-spreads-global-panic/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.theexpertseo.com/google-breaks-down-spreads-global-panic/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Feb 2009 11:39:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[TopNews]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bloggers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gmail]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Google UK]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.theexpertseo.com/?p=52</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[

If you ever doubted the power of Google, then a minor snafu late Saturday exposed just how reliant the world is on the California search giant.
Anyone performing a simple search through Google got quite a shock when all results, no matter how innocent, came back marked &#8220;This site may harm your computer&#8221; &#8211; Google&#8217;s standard [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="story_image"><img src="http://estb.msn.com/i/82/BD91A4B7803B26BA6037137B760F9.jpg" alt="N/A" width="200" height="150" /></div>
<div class="article_segbody">
<p>If you ever doubted the power of Google, then a minor snafu late Saturday exposed just how reliant the world is on the California search giant.</p>
<p>Anyone performing a simple search through Google got quite a shock when all results, no matter how innocent, came back marked &#8220;This site may harm your computer&#8221; &#8211; Google&#8217;s standard designation applied to sites known to peddle malware, viruses and worse.</p>
<p><strong>Online outrage</strong></p>
<p>Although the problem was fixed within about 40 minutes, the almost-instant outpouring of internet outrage spoke volumes about the importance of Google &#8211; and its 235 million daily searches &#8211; remaining healthy.</p>
<p>Bloggers, Twitterers and journalists alike practically wept with worry about everything from getting information to how online stores might fail if no-one could visit them.</p>
<p><strong>Our bad</strong></p>
<p>As for the problem itself, it stemmed from a third-party list of suspicious sites that someone at Google uploaded wrongly.</p>
<p>The list featured a single entry containing just the character &#8216;/&#8217;, which effectively told the search engine that absolutely all sites should be blacklisted.</p>
<p><strong>Human error</strong></p>
<p>Google Search vice president Marissa Mayer explained: &#8220;What happened? Very simply, human error&#8230; Fortunately, our on-call site reliability team found the problem quickly.&#8221;</p>
<p>Almost choking on humble pie, the statement continued: &#8220;Our apologies to any of you who were inconvenienced &#8230; and to site owners whose pages were incorrectly labelled. We will carefully investigate this incident and put more robust file checks in place to prevent it from happening again.&#8221;</p>
<p>A Google UK spokesman we talked with early on Sunday confirmed the US line that Saturday&#8217;s fault, &#8220;was caused by a human error on Google&#8217;s part, and we fixed the issue as soon as we became aware of the problem.&#8221;</p>
<p><strong>Gmail issues</strong></p>
<p>Although the problem has been dealt with, there may be lasting issues. The wonky malware filtering system also directed some legitimate email into Gmail&#8217;s spam folder.</p>
<p>Google engineer Brad Taylor explained what to do: &#8220;We&#8217;re working to roll out an automated fix to put these legitimate messages back into your inboxes, and we expect this to happen within a day. In the meantime, if you were expecting a critical message this morning, please check your spam folder.&#8221;</p>
<p><span style="font-size: xx-small;">News Source &#8211; uk.msn.com</span></div>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.theexpertseo.com/google-breaks-down-spreads-global-panic/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
